Tuesday, May 5, 2026

ROOMMATES (2026)

 

Directed By: Chandler Levack

Written By: Jimmy Fowlie and Ceara Jane O’Sullivan 

Cinematography: Maria Rusche 

Editor: Tim Constain and Brian Robinson

Cast: Sadie Sandler, Chloe East, Billy Bryk, Aidan Langford, Sarah Sherman, Nick Kroll, Natasha Lyonne, Janeane Garofolo 

When a hopeful, naive college freshman, Devon, asks the cool and confident Celeste to be her roommate, a blossoming friendship spirals into a war of passive aggression.


This is one of those almost films. It has everything mostly going for it and then just falls short. It’s Slightly Silly but stayed entertaining and really Manages to make you care about the characters. Then the third act happens and it’s like they just want to end the film. As after that no subtlety. Just straightforward hostility.

The third act the film falls apart. As feels like it goes for the easy out.  instead of doing something original and different. It goes safe and just settles to villainize certain characters.

I know looking for some kind of realism or three dimensional characters in an Adam Sandler, HAPPY MADISON production is a lot to ask but it could amhave been something new or different.

As with This film anytime it approach’s depth, It runs far and wide away from it. 

Some will look at this as a vanity project for Adam  Sandler’s daughter Sadie Sandler and they would be correct, but she holds her own surrounded by other talents. Not to mention this film is better then the original comedies he has been offering lately. At least this is better then YOU ARE SO NOT INVITED TO MY BAH MITZVAH.

Chloe East impresses, as far as showing range and being totally different then the last performance I remember her from HERETIC. She again defintely makes her presence felt. As the antagonist.

This can be seen as its own kind of relationship comedy. Only Without some homoerotica, yet never leaning heavily on it. Happy to see a fun female centered comedy that is mostly successful. 

Director Chandler Levack does the best she can. As her original movies such as I LIKE MOVIES are much more character-driven. Especially as far as the action goes, but are as breezy and caring. Here working from a script that is not her own. She manages to still bring her style and skill. Showing range and that she is a director who can rise to the occasion. 

Grade: C 

Sunday, May 3, 2026

MOVIES WATCHED IN APRIL (2026)

 

MOVIES WATCHED IN APRIL (2023) 

SENTIMENTAL VALUE (DRAMA)(FOREIGN)(INTERNATIONAL)(NORWAY) 8/10 



PIZZA MOVIE (COMEDY)(TEEN) 6/10 



BALLERINA (ACTION) 7/10 




THE IN-CROWD (TEEN)(COMING OF AGE)(MUSIC) 6.5/10 




CLUNY BROWN (CLASSIC)(ROMANCE)(COMEDY) 7/10 




MIKE AND NICK AND NICK AND ALICE (SCIENCE FICTION)(COMEDY)(CRIME)(ACTION) 5/10 




THE TESTAMENT OF ANN LEE (MUSICAL)(DRAMA) 7/10 





SIRAT (DRAMA)(FOREIGN)(INTERNATIONAL)(SPAIN) 9/10 





DUST BUNNY (FANTASY)(CRIME) 6.5/10 





PROJECT HAIL MARY (SCIENCE FICTION)(DRAMA) 9/10 




A FINE MESS (COMEDY) 3/10 




OUTCOME (COMEDY)(DRAMA) 5/10 





BALLS UP (COMEDY) 6/10 





THE VOICE OF HIND RAJAB (DRAMA)(TRUE LIFE)(INTERNATIONAL)(FOREIGN)(TUNISIA) 




NIGHT PATROL (HORROR)(ACTION) 6.5/10




CHRISTY (DRAMA)(SPORTS)(TRUE LIFE) 7/10 





BLACK EYED SUSAN (SCIENCE FICTION)(EROTIC)(ROMANCE)(CULT) 8/10 





APEX (ACTION)(THRILLER) 6.5/10 





ROOMMATES (TEEN)(COMEDY) 6/10 




CRIME 101 (THRILLER)(DRAMA)(CRIME) 6/10 




*DARK ANGEL (I COME IN PEACE) (SCIENCE FICTION)(ACTION) 7/10 




LOVE & POP (DRAMA)(COMING OF AGE)(FOREIGN)(INTERNATIONAL)(JAPAN) 6/10 




OUT OF THE PAST (CLASSIC)(FILM NOIR) 7/10 





TELEVISION SERIES, TELEVISION MOVIES, STAND-UP & SPECIALS



TED (SEASON 2) 7/10 



MALCOLM IN THE MIDDLE: LIFE’S STILL UNFAIR (LIMITED SERIES) 6/10 




RAMY YOUSSEF: IN LOVE (STAND-UP) 7/10 





NIKKI GLASER: GOOD GIRL (STAND-UP) 7/10 


Saturday, May 2, 2026

ANACONDA (2025)

 

Directed By: Tom Gormican 

Written By: Tom Gormican and Kevin Etten

Based on the original film “ANACONDA” written by: Hans Bauer, Jim Cash and Jack Epps Jr. 

Cinematography: Nigel Bluck 

Editor: Craig Alpert and Gregory Plotkin 

CAST: Jack Black, Paul Rudd, Thandiwe Newton, Steve Zahn, Daniela Melchior, Selton Mello, Rui Ricardo Diaz, Ione Skye 

Four film obsessives drag themselves into the Amazon on a shoestring dream: make a spiritual sequel to a schlocky 90s horror classic nobody asked for. Doug is the engine, a guy whose genuine talent has been slowly suffocating under wedding reception footage. Griff has the rights and the actor’s hunger but not much else. The rain-forest is indifferent. The snake is absent. What the film is really about is the distance between loving movies and actually making one, and whether passion alone can paper over every logistical, financial, and interpersonal crack that opens up the moment you leave home with a camera and a bad plan.


This is a film that Not only makes me question why was this made, but also what studio thought this was a good idea I can only imagine because of having Jack black and Paul Rudd together in some kind of buddy comedy ensemble film. 

As it sounded like a bad idea from the get go, but was hoping it would be broader or bring something different to the table. Even though it plays pretty rote 

Co-Written and directed by Tom Gormican whose previous films were AXEL F the latest BEVERLY HILLS COP movie (as a writer) and THE UNBEARABLE WEIGHT OF MASSIVE TALENT,  as writer-director. Both films going back into the past of celebrities or iconic movie characters. Don’t feels a natural that he would take a move that was a surprise hit and known for it’ ridiculous nature and make it into a meta comedy that resurrects the film franchise and it’s cultural impact.

Though it shows he has a fascination with films and stars. His material which should be enriching and filled with influences. It Comes across more as cute but not necessarily strong or memorable. 

Originally this was supposed to be a reunion of his stars from UBEARABLE WEIGHT Nicolas Cage and Pedro Pascal but when he couldn’t get them. We got Paul Rudd and Jack black. Who try to have chemistry and play against type with Jack black more than straight man and responsible one. Where as Paul Rudd plays the more wild and impulsive character.

There are 2 cameos in the film one works and is the only time the film is truly alive and hilarious. The other one doesn’t and feels unneeded 

What kept me entertained throughout the film

Was Wondering what is  going on with thandwe newton’s hair. As its volume, length and styles change throughout the film with each new scene. Now that could have been a clever satire of the constant problem of actors of color complaining often they are fixed to wear uncomfortable and badly styled wigs. Due to not having proper hair and make-up people who know how to style their hair. Instead it just happens in the background and one wonders was it intentional or not. Though happy to see her working again. 

Will admit the film is Awkwardly casted. As the actors don’t seem like they would normally work together, but here make it through believably enough and Nice to see Steve zahn part of the cast as him and Jack black have a a small SAVING SILVERMAN reunion

Ultimately though the film not most of it’s ideas It truly goes anywhere and make the material

feel empty. Even if it was just a more comedic remake of the original film. It would have amounted to something 

The film does serve as a constant reminder that Jack Black really needs better and new material film wis. As the only time he seen interesting or in better films is when he works with filmmaker Richard Linklater (Bernie, Apollo 10 1/2) so that it feels like the films he chooses get worse and worse though he stays energetic and likable in all of them. Though since half of them make money at the box office. Other than partially reputation he really has no reason to change his trajectory.

This is a film that could have set itself up. As either a satire or parody and instead comes across as confused as its premise. Though it would have been nice to be a film that shows character who are bonded by their love of not only film but a certain film and the pains and stakes they are willing to take to remake the film out of passion and love. Not to mention a chance to relive part of their childhood and reunite with one another. 

Almost like those guys who remade RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK. In their teens a scene by scene remake and only later in life did the world get to see it, finally and they did it out of love for the film. If only this movie came close to having that kind of sincerity, vision and heart. It could have made this film worthwhile. Instead it just feels unnecessary and useless.

 

Grade: F