Sunday, October 4, 2026

MOVIES+ WATCHED IN SEPTEMBER (2026)

 


————————————————————————————————

Z (FOREIGN)(INTERNATIONAL)(THRILLER)(DRAMA)(ALGERIA)   9/10 

MUSTACHE (COMING OF AGE)(COMEDY)(DRAMA) 7/10 

MAYDAY (ACTION)(COMEDY) 7/10 

ONSLAUGHT (ACTION)  7/10 

THE BIG EASY (THRILLER) 5/10 

MOTHER MARY (CULT)(EXPERIMENTAL)(DRAMA) 6.5/10

SOMEWHERE IN QUEENS (COMING OF AGE)(DRAMA)(COMEDY) 6/10 

YOU, ME & TUSCANY (ROMANCE) 6/10 

PENNY LANE IS DEAD (THRILLER) 8/10 

A WALK ON THE MOON (DRAMA) 

SUPERGIRL (FANTASY)(ACTION) 5/10 

RUBY’S BUCKET OF BLOOD (DRAMA) 

ORPHANS (DRAMA) 7/10 

LIEBESTRUM (THRILLER)(DRAMA) 

WHEN A STRANGER APPEARS (THRILLER) 6/10 

HEAVEN IS FOR REAL (DRAMA)(FAMILY) 6/10

*RUN (THRILLER) 5/10 

FIND YOUR FRIENDS (THRILLER) 5/10 

MARAMA (DRAMA)(THRILLER) 6/10 

THE LAWNMOWER MAN (SCIENCE FICTION) 5/10

ARE WE GOOD? (DOCUMENTARY) 7/10

RESIDENT EVIL (HORROR) 8/10 

*BLANK CHECK (FAMILY)(COMEDY) 6/10 

THE WRONG MAN (THRILLER) 7/10

EYE OF GOD (DRAMA) 9/10 

A SHOCK TO THE SYSTEM (COMEDY)(THRILLER) 6/10 

EEPHUS (COMEDY) 7/10 

BUZZKILL (HORROR)(COMEDY) 7/10 

UPROAR (COMING OF AGE)(DRAMA) 5/10 

STOP! THAT TRAIN (COMEDY) (LGBTQ+) 4/10 

BLOODY TENNIS (HORROR) 6/10 

TELEVISION SERIES, TELEVISION MOVIES, STAND-UP & SPECIALS

HACKS (Season 5) (8/10)

PATTON OSWALT – TEA & SCOTCH (STAND-UP) 6/10 

X-MEN ‘97 (Season 1) 7/10 

ADULTS (Season 2) 7/10 

 

OJ UNSEEN: EXPLOITATION OF EVIL (Limited Series) 8/10 

NICOLE BYER – AN EVENING OF CROWD WORK (STAND-UP) 7/10


Saturday, October 3, 2026

A WOUNDED FAWN (2022)

 

Directed By: Travis Stevens

Written By: Travis Stevens and Nathan Faudree

Cinematography: Ksusha Genenfeld

Editor: Zach Clark and Travis Stevens

Cast: Josh Ruben, Sarah Lind, Malin Barr, Katie Kung, Lakshmi Hedemark, Tanya Everett, Marshall Taylor Thurman, Neal Mayer 

A serial killer brings an unsuspecting new victim on a weekend getaway to add another body to his ever-growing count. She’s buying into his faux charms, and he’s eagerly lusting for blood. What could possibly go wrong?


This film has a very original trajectory, whereas the first half plays more traditional and linear where it surprises you and it feels a little more predictable as we have seen this before a kind of serial killer working his way on a current victim. 

Then all of a sudden the film which already was leaning into more psychological and the psychedelic. Totally moves and gives itself up to that direction where we are now seeing the delusions and the reality of the situation that the serial killer has found himself in.

Where he is haunted by different ghosts, demons of past victims telling him what to do and also torturing him as he tries to find his latest victim and to see if she is truly alive or is she dead?

This is where the film also becomes more violent and a little grotesque, though it stays captivating as you wonder what’s real and what isn’t just like the lead character and wondering where this is going to go and what is the ultimate ending.

This isn’t a film one could call light, but it does try to offer something new and different and a bit more experimental in the genre that keeps you guessing, and usually you will be wrong as to where it might go or where it goes, which adds a little decadent fund to the whole endeavor.

This room isn’t gonna be for everyone so if you’re looking for the traditional horror film, this is probably not for you or even if you’re looking for a slash or film this is not going to be the film for it but if you like your horror a little out there and maybe a little thought-provoking and unsteady this might be the film for you

Grade: B-

Friday, October 2, 2026

THE LIVING DEAD GIRL (1982)

 

Directed By: Jean Rollin 

Written By: Jean Rollin, Jacques Ralf and Gregory Heller

Cinematography: Max Monteillet 

Editor: Janette Kronegger 

Cast: Francoise Blanchard, Marina Pierro, Mike Marshall, Carina Barone, Fanny Maggier, Patricia Besnard-Rousseau, Veronique Pinson, Sandrine Morel 

A toxic spill revives a beautiful, dead heiress who, with the help of her childhood friend, must quench her insatiable thirst for blood.


This is the first Jean Rollin directed film that I have seen, even as his films are notorious it film circles for their more sexual material in the middle of being a horror film and here is a perfect example, even though this is the first and only I’ve seen I imagine that the rest of his films are similar to a degree only hopefully better quality

Has this film plays like a 1970s softcore movie that strives to be artistic in European mixed with random ridiculous violence that looks like it should be in a low budget grind house horror film that is even over the top four it subject matter

At heart it’s a love story that is also a zombie movie where the female zombie in this film has quite amazing strength and seems to be perfectly presented and not the George Romero type where they crave brains in our continuously rotting. The zombie is cannibalistic, though that doesn’t seem to come out until the second half of the film Moore..

Which by the end doesn’t even matter because even though it’s zombies, the film seems to have the same rules where it could’ve easily been a vampire but it seems like the filmmakers were like well. We’ve been there and done that so let’s move on to zombies which I can’t blame the filmmakers for because eventually that is how Hollywood started treating the genre also it seems more in the early 2000s when there was a horror where vampire suddenly became in in the shadow of the popular TWILIGHT movies those after realizing the overkill and dwindling box office of those particular creatures, always romantic nature and always seeming to come around once in a while they moved to zombies, but not just plain old zombie films soon we were starting to get zombie films that were romantic like WARM BODIES or just zombies in general to be our protagonist who we feel sorry for as they are cursed or just a general villain. 

Director Jean Rollin’s style makes the film feel like his own personal fetish or fantasy material with actress Francoise Blanchard, as he seems or makes the camera seem obsessed with her from the many angles in poses he has her do especially nude as well as her female, best friend and lover, played by Marina Pierro though not as obsessed with her she is quite beautiful and stunning in her own right prove that the coldest or most evil monsters aren’t always the supernatural kind

Luckily, the film does have a plot that is barely there, but there is a story that ties everything together, which is a essentially a forbidden romance film between two women with themes of obsession that feels overall throughout, even while trying to show one’s devotion to the other

It comes across pretty pretentious as it tries at certain points to be classy, but it has just a low class style, like wanting to be artistic, but also wanting to be down with the people while providing plenty of sex which year is more nudity and violence at which at times can be gory, though only in one scene does it feel like it keeps going on and on and over the top

I believe the film is a bit anti-American. As it has the only American player by Mike Marshall be a complete idiot and blind to all that is going on around him. As he is the amateur photographer who keep snooping in and investigating’s boyfriend.

The film is a lesbian romance that is interrupted and slowly starts to break down and become more dramatic and tries to involve certain characters investigating these uncommon occurrences, though they seem here only for the audience to get more of a backstory that the two main characters are not providing

By the end, the film feels much do about nothing. The type that you probably wanted to watch when you were 13 only because you saw on the TV Guide that it had nudity and sexual themes, but then were partially disappointed because he had to sit through so much just to get to those scenes and it’s still seeing the kind of odd or something that you weren’t used to, though I wonder if that is what shaped certain artist Taste was going in for one thing expecting more T And A as well as exploitation and in sitting through all of the film just to get to that they also started to learn to appreciate art of foreign cultures, depth, story, or seek out what they weren’t used to necessarily.

The quality of this film could’ve been more understood if it had been made in the 60s or 70s, but this was made in 1982. It feels like the filmmaker’s knew better then again maybe it was a throwback for them rather than trying to be modern or they were trying to make a film that seemed more dipped in the past with for 1982 modern sensibilities as it was a decade just beginning and hadn’t quite found an identity yet, but was coming into its own

There is an English language version of the film. That was filmed and directed by Gregory heller only using the same cast and crew. A she would film the same exact scenes in English right after they did them originally in French. It was never released and thought to be a lost film or lost version of the film. 

Though even if it hopefully was one of those films that was a Gateway drug to better quality films of this type, this was still a major disappointment, though it will be slow. Can’t wait to see how this one measured up to his other films in terms of quality. As with this one, I like the song that it inspired by Rob Zombie, which to me is more exciting than the actual film that inspired it here.

For me this film is overhyped 

Grade: D+ 

Tuesday, September 29, 2026

BUDDY (2026)

 

Directed By: Casper Kelly

Written By: Casper Kelly and Jamie King

Cinematography: Zach Kuperstein

Editor: Josh Ethier 

Cast: Delaney Quinn, Caleb Williams, Cristin Milioti, Topher Grace, Keegan-Michael Key, Patton Oswalt, Michael Shannon, Clint Howard

A brave girl and her friends must escape a kids television show.


There are some movies where the less you know going in, the better. BUDDY is definitely one of them.

This is a film that can be ambiguous and awkward, but always feels just a bit off and creepy. Yet somewhat comfortable 

If you’re familiar with writer-director Casper Kelly’s short for ADULT SWIM, TOO MANY COOKS you may already have an idea of the kind of strange, unsettling sense of humor he brings to the table. That short took something as harmless and familiar as television opening themes and slowly revealed something much darker bubbling underneath. This film plays with that same idea of innocence turning increasingly… well, not so innocent. And this film is definitely out there.

The first fifteen minutes might test your patience or your willingness to go along with it. As we’re introduced to what appears to be an actual children’s television show. Episode after episode, everything seems cute, cheerful and perfectly harmless. Then, almost imperceptibly, things begin to feel a little wrong. And then a little more wrong. Before long, you realize you’re not watching the movie you thought you were watching.

I won’t say much more, because discovering where BUDDY goes is part of the fun. The film has an unusual way of withholding information, and by the time it reaches the end, it leaves you with more questions than answers. Normally that might frustrate me, but here I found myself wanting to know more.

That’s probably the nicest thing I can say about the film: I wanted more.

The recognizable adult cast is used barely, with the kids essentially carrying the movie. And despite the innocent looking premise, this is absolutely not a movie for children. There is some disturbing violence involving kids that will understandably be difficult for some viewers.

But what makes the film refreshing is that it never seems particularly interested in giving you exactly what you expect.

This isn’t your typical horror movie. In fact, some people may find that disappointing. There are moments when you expect the film to push things further, only for it to pull back and leave you wondering what exactly you just watched.

Personally, I appreciated that restraint.

BUDDY is disturbing, strange and occasionally bizarre, but there’s something wonderfully curious about it. It feels like a movie that wants you to think about it afterward rather than simply move on to the next thing.

Is it for everybody? Absolutely not, But maybe that’s part of why I liked it.

There’s something to be said for a movie that doesn’t completely explain itself, doesn’t follow the usual rules and leaves you just curious enough to want to step back into its world.

So if you’re looking for something familiar, predictable and comfortably within the lines, this  probably isn’t your movie. But if you’re willing to take a chance on something weird? Give it a try.

No matter what, I have a feeling you’ll remember it.

Grade: B+