BLACK EYED SUSAN (2024)

Written & Directed By: Scooter McCrae

Cinematography: Anton Zion

Cast: Damian Maffei, Yvonne Emilie Thalker, Scott Fowler, Marc Romeo, Kate Kiddo, Vito Trigo

Desperate for work, Derek accepts a job replacing his recently-deceased friend at a tech startup. Continuing to develop the company’s innovative project means working intimately with Susan, a bleeding-edge BDSM sex doll meant to receive and appreciate punishment as an integral part of her evolving AI. Derek will soon test the limits of his own desires and explore the nature of man and woman, pleasure and pain, and life and death in a morally uncertain future world.

---

This is a tough film to talk about without spoilers

This is one of those films that almost dares you to describe it, because the moment you do, you risk ruining the very thing it’s built on: discomfort, surprise, and a slow, deliberate seduction of the viewer.

At first, it plays like something provocative for the sake of it teasing eroticism, brushing up against disgust, testing where your limits lie. But that tension feels intentional. The film isn’t just pushing buttons; it’s studying which ones you’re willing to let it press. Much like its title character, it lures you in with a kind of controlled intimacy, only to shift the ground beneath you when you think you understand the rules.

There’s a sneaky, almost anthology like quality to it, something that echoes the spirit of TALES FROM THE CRYPT mixed with THE TWILIGHT ZONE and throw in some BLACK MIRROR, but stripped of comfort and pushed further into psychological unease. It’s less interested in outright shock than in escalation. Every time it feels like the film might settle, it pivots. Every time you adjust, it sharpens.

Visually, it leans into its independent roots. There’s a rawness to the presentation that feels almost out of time reminiscent of early 2000s genre films, but the themes are distinctly modern, even uncomfortably so. The sci-fi elements are there, though used sparingly. When they do arrive, they land with purpose rather than spectacle.

What really anchors it, though, is the performance at its center. The actor behind Black Eyed Susan: Yvonne Emilie Thalker commits fully, there’s no visible safety net, no distance from the material. It’s the kind of performance that doesn’t just carry the film, it exposes it.

And make no mistake, this is not an easy watch. It’s meant to wear you down a little, to test your endurance as much as your curiosity. The film hits hard, pulls back just enough, then hits harder. Not always through violence, but through the creeping sense that it’s always one step ahead of your comfort.

The less you know going in, the better. Just understand that it’s a film built on provocation. One that invites conversation, maybe even confrontation, long after it ends.

Whether it’s worth the experience, that’s part of the question it leaves behind.

Grade: B 

SCARED SHITLESS (2024)

 

Directed By: Viveno Caldinelli

Written By: Brandon Cohen 

Cinematography: Rudolf Blahacek

Editor: Christopher Minns 

Cast: Steven Ogg, Daniel Doheny, Chelsea Clark, Marcia Bennett, Mark McKinney, Brynn Godenir, Don Tripe, Lorna Wilson 

This film stayed constantly entertaining even if at times it is in bad taste, but that is half the fun of the film where sometimes, it just feels so wrong that it’s right.

---

The film isn’t exactly something you’ve never seen before. It’s your typical monster film. Only it happens to involve a creature that mainly stays in the sewage system in a building’s toilets.

This would’ve been the type of trauma would’ve definitely put out back in the day or the type of midnight movie you’d see on USA’s up all night. This is the tyoenyoynaccisentoy discover in a video store or on Late night cable. Under the influence and go with it’s Off kilter appeal 

Luckily, at only 75 minutes it never overstays its welcome and seems a perfect length for its story and premise. It has its fair share of laughs and scares with plenty of shock comedy as most of the victims tend to be elderly people.

It feels more classic old school with its practical special effects and creature design throughout, but doesn’t give much explanation of why but you enjoy nonetheless.

Not surprised that this film is Executive produced by Steven Kostanski (PSYCHO GOREMAN, THE VOID) especially considering the material. 

Luckily, not as gross as one might expect, although a little nasty and somewhat graphic when it comes to the violence. 

It never runs out of fuel though of course leave room for a sequel which one wouldn’t mind. 

Grade: C+ 

CRIME WAVE (1985)

Written, Cinematography & Directed By: John Paizs 

Editor: John Paizs, Gerry Klym and John Coutts 

Cast: John Paizs, Eva Kovacs, Darrell Baran, Jeffrey Owen Madden, Tea Andrea Tanner, Mark Hunter, Neal Lawrie, Bob Cloutier 

A young director intent on making “the greatest color crime movie ever” can’t seem to finish his script–he has a beginning and an end, but he can’t quite figure out the middle. The daughter of his landlord, excited to have a real “movie person” living nearby, tries to help by putting him in touch with a man who wants to collaborate on a script–the strange “Dr. Jolly”.

---

Not to be confused with CRIMEWAVE directed By Sam Raimi and written with The Coen Brothers,  it bit are throwbacks with a kinetic comedic energy throughout that Involve crime stories. 

This movie is fast and loose. It’s silly and feels like a live action cartoon most of the time.

Crimewave feels like flipping through channels in the early days of NICKELODEON (the channel) that strange, electric moment in the 1980s when everything felt handmade, a little off, wildly imaginative, that was strange but you go it and anything was possible. As you were in on it and often the entertainment was Canadian. That comparison oddly fits, because while this is a Canadian production, it’s also brimming with a manic creativity and cartoon energy that is very much not for kids. This is playful cinema with sharp edges.

At its core, the film is a love letter to storytelling itself. It follows a director figure who seems to have at least one true believer in his talent, and through him we experience the flights of fancy that leap from his imagination into reality. The stories he dreams up, the characters he invents, and the worlds he escapes into all blur together, creating a film that feels actively alive—like it’s being written, revised, and reimagined in real time.

There’s an infectious enthusiasm to the way the film moves. We watch this creator live out adventures just as absurd and chaotic as the stories he’s writing, and the movie invites us to get lost alongside him. It’s propelled by voice, motion, and momentum, even when logic takes a backseat. That’s part of the charm and occasionally, part of the problem.

Halfway through, Crimewave reveals itself as a glorious oddity. It doesn’t quite know where it wants to go, and when it finally does arrive somewhere, it feels less like a traditional ending and more like an extended epilogue. The narrative thins out, but it does so in a way that feels intentional. Like the story is less interested in resolution than in wrapping its arms around its own madness.

Adding to the strangeness is the silent protagonist, who never speaks until the very end. Instead, everyone around him fills in the gaps, talking for him, about him, around him. Then turning the film into a chorus of voices orbiting a quiet center. It’s a bold choice, and one that reinforces the idea that this is a world shaped by imagination more than realism.

The film is more mad than you might know as the writer Director cinematographer also plays lead as the filmmaker. I guess that’s one way where you don’t have to worry about missing your lines so this might have been an extent of his imagination, placing himself in other situations or maybe it’s a confessional tale that means something bigger and is all about his writing

The score plays a crucial role in keeping everything suspended in an alternate realm, giving the film its dreamlike quality. Meanwhile, the ensemble cast jumps from character to character in a way that feels chaotic but connected, each performance feeding into the next like a chain reaction of eccentric personalities.

Ultimately, Crimewave is a fun, rare find. A movie that values invention over polish and energy over neatness. Even when it slows down to humanize its characters and ground itself emotionally, it remains entertaining, curious, and oddly endearing. It may not fully behave like a “proper” film, but that refusal is exactly what makes it worth watching.

Grade: B 

REFLECTIONS IN A DEAD DIAMOND (2025)

 

Written & Directed By: Helene Cattet & Bruno Forzani

Cinematography: Maunuel Dacosse

Editor: Bernard Beets

Cast: Fabio Testi, Yannick Reiner, Koen De Bouw, Maria De Mediros, Celine Camara, Thi-Mai Nguyen, Kezia Quental, Herve Sogne 

A retired spy suspects his former adversaries have resurfaced when his intriguing neighbor vanishes.

————————————————————————-

A new film by the directing team of Helene Cattet & Bruno Forzani is always going to be a strange yet original affair. This might actually be the film. That is the best entry for newcomers to discover the filmmakers work. As strangely this is their closest to mainstream film, that is still odd & avant-garde, but beautifully and miraculously filmed.

When it comes to this directing and writing team, you always know you’re gonna be taken on a rollercoaster. Yet never quite sure which direction it will take, but there will be plenty of unforgettable sights and sounds. though you can never say it will be boring and it will always be quite memorable

 The  film is more about the visuals than anything else, story or plot wise. As this film feels more of a theme that has a weakness for distractions and fetishes

It is espionage themed and very violent, though has more humor than the filmmakers usual films. It plays almost like a parody of spy films specifically from the 1960s, but with a little modern day, technology and charm, but definitely a throwback vintage style. 

The film is visually delicious and beautiful throughout. Though it has feel a bit like artistic exploitation.

As the film has its fair share of strong, beautiful women only to be slaughtered. While all the male characters are seen as heroic, no matter their behavior. 

This film is strange that as it goes along, you start to get into its rhythms. Where you question what is going on half the time but except what you are given.

The film almost feels like music video directing, only better. As you were given more of a visual feast in a thorough story that is like patchwork. As it’s more set in the 1960s espionage style and design, but could be modern. Where the production and costume design are pristine. As this is very different from the previous films made by the directing duo as this is more lighthearted and fun, but ultimately by the end, still a bit sad

Grade: A 

RUNNING TIME (1997)

Directed By: Josh Becker

Written By: Josh Becker and Peter Choi

Story By: Peter Choi

Cinematography: Kurt Rauf 

Editor: Raymond Berthheaud and Kaye Davis

Cast: Bruce Campbell, Jeremy Roberts, Anita Barone, Stan Davis, Art LaFluer, Dana Craig, Gordon Jennison, Curtis Taylor, Bridget Hoffman 

Carl is released from jail after serving a 5-year term and immediately sets about executing his next heist. The plan is relatively simple but time is critical. However, he doesn’t factor in bad luck or the incompetence of his accomplices.

---

It is taking me a while to finally watch this film in full, which is surprising considering it’s barely over an hour though over the years I’ve always seem to catch it in the middle or way late into. It’s running time.

So it’s refreshing to finally watch the film from beginning to end as it is an experiment where the film takes place in real time and made to look like it’s one endless continuous take, and shot.

While giving the film kind of a bee movie plot and in black and white that makes it feel time looks like it could take place at any time this film could’ve been a minor Marvel if not for a few things that take away from the film.

The early homophobic language which feels more character based and acceptable in the time period in which this film is made and set don’t know if it’s was any original script or if it was an ab Lib it’s understandable, but also unneeded and comes out of nowhere.

Early in the film, you pretty much know where it’s gonna go as Bruce Campbell playing the lead in the man who’s getting out of prison with no nonsense plan already with his screwup of a best friend who seemed to cut corners here and there if you can tell a success is not in their future.

Not to mention how many times they keep bringing up their past that even after a while it feels like overkill as we get it we get the depths of their friendship and their relationship

Then even with a kind of positive ending, it feels unbelievable you want it for the characters but again it just feels so out of left field where you wondered did they not have enough money for a grand finale or was it always meant to be that simple?

If not for these negatives, this film could’ve been seen as an underrated classic it certainly not worthy, especially for what it pulls off and on such a low budget by director writer Josh Becker, who was part of Sam Raimi’s production team, which is obviously how we got Bruce Campbell involved, most likely.

Josh Becker actually sold a script to a studio for around $67,000. That still has yet to be made but he used that money to make this film as Mr. Becker is quite a director whose films are more cult titles such as THOU SHALT NOT KILL… EXCEPT and LUNATICS: A LOVE STORY. That showcase quite an imagination and creativity. I am in particular a fan of his films, though they are a little harder to find over the years.

Even if at time it feels like watching an off broadway play in a black box theater by a new playwrite. It somehow works and is admirable. 

The film was shot in 10 days, in order. So not in one continuous take. Bruce Campbell has said that his performance in this film and BUBBA HO-TEP are the one’s he is most proud of 

Though I also have to give the film credit for giving Jeremy Roberts, a well-known character actor, a decent part where he gets to play full supporting instead of just a henchman or a villain or just a general bad guy who doesn’t have much lines even though he’s a screwup you kind of like his character in this film.

Anita Barone in a supporting role as a hooker, and maybe love interest who has a past with the main character is certainly vivacious and eye catching, but she does make her mark in her limited screen time to make her an interesting character that you wish had more screen time in a chance to see how she got to where she was, but she certainly engaging.

The cinematography here is top notch. You can tell the film is low budget so it’s not the prettiest, but it is well filmed and again at least while watching it you can see imagination and ideas at work as well as a bit of a throwback to maybe the films that might have inspired.

This is definitely a film. I think most film fans and independent filmmakers should see they don’t necessarily need to see but when they feel like they wanna watch something original and maybe a bit from the recent pass this is a foundation definitely check out. 

It’s a close, but no cigar, at least you’re gonna be smoking

Grade: B-